Rantz: Deputy Seattle City Attorney lives in NYC, releases criminals that won’t hurt him – MyNorthwest.com

Deputy Seattle City Attorney John Schochet remotely connected to a Seattle City Council committee hearing from what appears to be an untidy closet. (Screengrab: Seattle Channel)

The Deputy Seattle City Attorney doesn’t live in Seattle. John Schochet doesn’t even live in Washington state. He lives across the country, working remotely in an office that’s already in over its head.

Maybe the out-of-state location makes it easier for the deputy attorney to back policies that so willingly releases criminals back on the streets where they so often reoffend. What’s worse, Schochet is the deputy helping advise on the so-called “poverty defense” bill that effectively legalizes most misdemeanor crimes in Seattle.

When you personally face no threat, it’s much easier to defend policies that put others at great harm.

Rantz: Seattle City Attorney releases prolific offender, nearly kills man hours later

Seattle deputy lives out of state while his office releases criminals

Schochet, a personal friend of Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes, is an executive member of the office.

The Deputy City Attorney moved to New York last year after marrying a New Yorker. The arrangement was to accommodate a reasonable and admirable family commitment for his new wife.

“The CAO [City Attorney’s Office] has been on remote work status since March 2020 due to the COVID pandemic. I moved from Seattle to New York in October 2020,” Schochet told the Jason Rantz Show on KTTH. “As you likely know, the City of Seattle does not have residency requirements for its employees, other than elected officials. The CAO is continuing remote work through at least July 5, 2021. I’m not sure what will happen after then, but it’s still quite a ways off at this point.”

To be clear, there’s no reason to believe Schochet is in derelict of his duties, as it were, by working remotely. He was also quite open about the situation, which is refreshing. And in my experiences with him on this and other stories, he has been quick to respond to inquiries.

But that’s not what this is about. His location in the context of current policy from the City Attorney matters.

Rantz: Seattle CM called police she defunded to report crime she is effectively legalizing

Seattle City Attorney policy actively releases criminals

Under Holmes, the City Attorney’s Office adopted a light-on-crime approach.

Driven by an ideology that favors endless chances at redemption over jail, criminals are released with little to no punishment. Unfortunately, these offenders go back to the streets and recommit crimes.

The latest high profile example occurred on Christmas night when suspect Abdalla Jama was arrested for head-butting a security guard. Despite witness testimony, Jama was released by the City Attorney’s Office without charges or conditions. Hours later, Jama was again arrested. He’s accused of nearly stomping a man to death with kicks so hard a witness could hear them from inside a car.

This example isn’t an anomaly. It’s the rule.

Almost all of Seattle’s 100 most prolific offenders, all of whom deal with homelessness based on a 2019 report, refuse to comply with court-ordered conditions. Yet under guidance by Holmes, the City Attorney’s Office still offers kid gloves when dealing with repeat offenders.

Rantz: As crimes surge, Seattle judge releases dangerous suspects without bail

Why Schochet’s location matters

The prosecutors who live in or visit Seattle already seem immune from concern over the negative effects their work has on the city.

But I can only hope that one day it will hit them what they’re doing to this city. Though I sincerely hope not literally in the form of a prolific offender they’ve released assaulting them the way they do innocent passers-by. I hope that when the prosecutors walk past the courthouse and see the human misery they’re causing, they’ll realize that maybe they should be part of the solution instead of the problem.

Not living here at all, even if his move is relatively recent? Every day that separates him from the city, is another day where I imagine it gets easier for Schochet, or anyone, to justify a policy that doesn’t pursue nearly 50% of misdemeanor charges.

He won’t ever be a theft victim of the criminal his office keeps releasing or charging lightly. The car prowler with a drug habit won’t ever break into his car. It’s parked on the other side of the country.

Would Schochet push back harder against the dangerous, first-of-its-kind poverty defense bill that will effectively legalize most misdemeanor crimes in Seattle?

Move back, or move on

I wish him the best in New York, which is where Schochet should find a job if he’s unwilling to move back to Seattle. Staying on the East Coast seems like the goal, which does seem like he’s taking advantage of the permissive city policy as he’s shopping around for a better out-of-state job.

As of December, Schochet was admitted to practice in NY. He tells me that “many attorneys are admitted in multiple states.” While his future plans are “TBD” at this point, he’s only practicing law in Washington, working full time, remotely for the City Attorney. (I did confirm he won’t turn against the Seahawks, which I suppose is one small victory.)

Not experiencing the results of the policies you’re enacting should be a disqualifier for the position, no matter how talented a lawyer or how nice a guy he seems over email.

Is Schochet the biggest problem facing the Seattle City Attorney’s Office? Not by a longshot. The office staff is full of ideologues. And Pete Holmes is a partisan radical. Until his replacement, this city is not safe.

But he is part of the problem and it is fixable — if he does the right thing and steps aside.

Listen to the Jason Rantz Show weekday afternoons from 3-6 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (or HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the podcast here. Follow @JasonRantz on Twitter, Instagram, and Parler and like me on Facebook

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Kyle Rittenhouse shooting victims seek $20 million in damages

GettyImages 1228192968

Summary List Placement

A man shot by Kyle Rittenhouse, and the parents of another person killed by the teenage vigilante, have filed a lawsuit against officials in Kenosha, Wisconsin, seeking millions of dollars in compensation for their pain and suffering.

As first reported by Milwaukee NBC affiliate WTMJ, Gaige Grosskreutz, who was shot in the arm by Rittenhouse after he killed another man, and the estate of Anthony Huber — one of two people shot dead — on Sunday notified Kenosha city and county officials, including police, of their intent to sue for a combined $20 million in damages.

Correspondence posted by WTMJ reporter Taylor Lumpkin shows that Grosskreutz seeks to hold officials responsible for “negligence” during protests against police violence on August 25, 2020, claiming it led to “significant permanent physical damage, pain, and suffering.”

Huber’s parents are making the same argument. Both parties seek $10 million.

Rittenhouse, a Trump supporter who crossed state lines with an semi-automatic weapon to patrol the streets of Kenosha, has been charged with two counts of first degree intentional homicide, two counts of first-degree reckless homicide, and attempted first-degree homicide.

In November, he posted $2 million in bail and is no longer in police custody. Rittenhouse, who claims he was in acting in self-defense, is represented by Lin Wood, a conspiracy theorist who has promoted QAnon and unfounded claims of election fraud.

Civil unrest erupted in Kenosha over the summer after police shot an unarmed Black man, Jacob Blake, multiple times in the back. He is now paralyzed.

Have a news tip? Email this reporter: cdavis@insider.com

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A cleaning expert reveals her 3-step method for cleaning your entire home quickly

Source link

Criminal Minds fans agree this character is underrated – Looper

More like the glue of the franchise really, since she was the only character to appear on all three Criminal Minds series, the original and both of its shorter-lived spin-offs, Criminal Minds: Suspect Behaviors and Criminal Minds: Beyond Borders. In addition, she appeared in all but one episode of the original series. And her value to the team was obvious, according to one commenter: “They wouldn’t be able to solve any cases without her!”

Multiple fans actually mentioned how helpless the BAU team would be without her, citing episodes as old as the fourth season and as recent as the thirteenth to make their case. “That was irrefutably proven during the Linda Barnes arc in season 13,” wrote u/ReidsMyFavorite. “The guy they got to ‘replace’ Garcia was a complete dud who couldn’t hack his way out of a paper bag, and the team really struggled to get anything done without her.”

But many of the posters pointed out how the value Garcia brings to the show extends beyond her contributions to the plot and the mystery of the week. She is a breath of fresh air on the team, a refreshing counterbalance to the serial killers and the stone-faced law enforcement officers out to get them.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link