State police arrest suspended lawyer accused of threatening R.I. judge – The Providence Journal

PROVIDENCE — A suspended lawyer was released on personal recognizance Friday after a state police detective told a judge that the man had sent threatening emails to the Supreme Court’s chief disciplinary counsel, writing that he should have “bombed that place” and that a Supreme Court justice should “just be shot in the face.”

“That’s just how it is,” the suspended 36-year-old lawyer, Nicholas Gelfuso, wrote in the same email, according to the presentation made by the detective in District Court, Providence.

Gelfuso, who had been the focus of a manhunt earlier on Friday, was charged with a count of making threats to officials and cyberstalking and cyberharassment.

The victims identified in the criminal complaint filed by state police are Supreme Court Chief Justice William P. Robinson III and the court’s disciplinary counsel David D. Curtin. The threatening emails were sent at 3:14 and 4:14 p.m. Thursday, said state police Detective Ruth Hernandez.

Gelfuso provided his own legal representation during his appearance before District Court Judge Stephen Isherwood.

He was arrested on a warrant Friday afternoon during a motor-vehicle stop by the Rhode Island State Police Violent Fugitive Task Force, according to state police.

The arrest came hours after authorities issued an alert that Gelfuso had threatened to shoot Supreme Court Justice William Robinson and blow up the Superior Court.

In July 2017, Gelfuso was arrested at his home in Cranston on a warrant charging him with cyberharassment, according to the state police.

At the time, The Providence Journal identified him as a lawyer who could no longer practice in Rhode Island under a suspension ordered by the state Supreme Court the previous month.

Gelfuso had missed several deadlines for making a case on behalf of a client, the order said. Then, after receiving several chances to get his representation back on track, he filed a “purported statement of the case” that was “incoherent” and filled “with scurrilous accusations alleging unethical and criminal conduct by the trial justice and the attorney representing the opposing party,” says the court’s order.

“Additionally,” says the 2017 order, Gelfuso “made outlandish allegations regarding the character of each Justice” of the state Supreme Court.

In a pleading in Family Court, Gelfuso had accused a judge of previously working for “a Jewish law firm on what can only be considered skid row” and asserted that the judge has “ties to the state and various conspiratorial fringe religious sects.”

When Gelfuso was asked to provide factual support for his allegations, he failed, says the order.

A spokesman for the courts, Craig N. Berke, told The Journal on Friday that Gelfuso’s license remains suspended.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *